|

|
June 5-7,
2006 : The meeting of the fifteenth technical committee
of the International Coordinating Committee for the Safeguarding
and Development of the Historic Site of Angkor (ICC).
|
As part of the
bi-annual meeting proceedings, the fifteenth technical committee
of the ICC was held on June 5-7, 2006. As usual, the meeting
was co-chaired by the representatives of the French and
Japanese Embassies while the organization and secretariat
was ensured by the Bureau of UNESCO in Phnom Penh, with
the assistance and collaboration of the APSARA Authority.
During its three days session, the meeting convened a wide
range and multidisciplinary scholars and specialists to
gather recent data and reflections on issues such as conservation
– restoration and sustainable development of the Historic
Site of Angkor. Through multidisciplinary presentations
and discussions, the meeting was an occasion to shed further
light on the history, to agree on guidelines for the preservation
work of the site and to deepen knowledge about the present
state of the temple, the scope of work that would be required
to proceed in the conservation program, and the ecological
connections between economic development and archeological
preservation of Angkor.
Among various recommendations, in accordance with the guidelines
for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention,
the ICC encouraged the adoption of a Management Plan necessary
to the long term safeguarding of the Angkor site. This management
plan should specifically include, amongst other things,
a general methodological frame for the conservation, restoration
and maintenance intervention to be carried out in the monuments.
Consequently, all the international missions that carry
out conservation work in the Archeological Park of Angkor
were encouraged by the ICC to contribute as much as possible
to the elaboration of this management plan in order to help
the APSARA Authority gather all the relevant guidelines
and operational items allowing a proper daily management
as well as long term safeguarding of the site of Angkor.
|

| In relation to the deterioration
of stones, a group of researchers from the Blaise Pascal University
of Clermont-Ferrand (France) proposed, through a partnership,
to undertake a critical assessment of the Ta Keo temple stability
and durability by studying the stone’s conditions and
their state of deterioration. The ICC recommended the adoption
of this proposal and asked for contributions to be made from
now on. The project will last for 4 years (2006-2009). Also
the ICC recommended that the 3D visual images of Bayon, which
were engineered by the Tokyo University as a part of the Japan-Apsara
for Safeguarding of Angkor (JASA) programme, to be provided
to the APSARA Authority and be placed in the future Welcome
Center. Furthermore, to promote worldwide educational awareness
of Angkor, the ICC asked that these images should be installed
in the official website of the World Heritage Center in Paris.
|
| On the researching
aspect, there was an important announcement of new chronological
findings for the reigns of King Jayavarman VII (now to be
dated 1182 to 1220); King Indravarman II (now to be dated
1220 to 1270); and King Jayavarman VIII (now to be dated 1270
to 1295). These findings are based on the reading of an important
Sanscrit inscription, which was carved at the beginning of
the XIV century, in the so-called Mangala?rtha temple. However,
the findings have not been officially confirmed and the ICC
has extended its request to JASA to undertake some surveys
underneath of the Central Tower of the Bayon in order to ensure
stability. Only these surveys will allow making an in-site
verification of the consequences of the new epigraphic data
and especially to establish with certainty of the history
of the construction of the temple and to check the stability
of the Tower in order to decide if it should be or not closed
to the public for safety reasons. |
The ICC expressed
its satisfaction with the competence and the performance
of which the APSARA Authority in undertaking in the conservation
works. The ICC was, especially, congratulated the APSARA
Authority for the entrustment it recently received from
the Royal Government of Cambodia to safeguard and to value
the important archeological and monumental site of Koh Ker.
Such entrustment does not only represent the competence
of the APSARA Authority over its jurisdiction and scope
of work, but also reflects its the commitment to comprehensively
and continuingly strengthen the capacity of its working
force as well as its institutional building. To assist the
APSARA Authority on its newly entrusted assignment, the
ICC recommended that the UNESCO group of Ad Hoc experts
undertake a field survey of the site and offer an evaluation
of its actual situation. The ICC also extended an appeal
to all involved international missions to voluntarily express
their interest in contributing to the documenting and the
safeguarding of Koh Ker. The will to propose bilateral or
multilateral cooperation for the safeguarding of this site
should be expressed by the interested parties during the
next ICC Plenary Session of December 2006.
On the issues of sustainable development, on May 4, 2006,
the APSARA Authority received the ISO 14001 Certificate
from Japan Quality Assurance for its pursuit of Environmental
Management System (EMS) on the Angkor Archeological Park.
The EMS is a mechanism which allows the APSARA Authority,
on the one hand, to standardize its environmental policy
and design proper measure to ensure minimal impacts on environment
from the economic and social development, and to further
bridge the intimate linkage and harmonization between “nature
to temple and the people” which means to say “environment
to culture and the community.” On the other hand,
it means to boost the social and organizational esteem in
preserving the environment with “the initiation of
Cambodia, implementation by Cambodia and for Cambodia.”
Among the environmental friendly projects, and on a temporary
trial period pending the result of sample survey conducted
with different visitors, is the electrical car which primarily
designed to reduce the pollution caused by the automobiles’
smoke. Also on this environmental issue, to pursue balance
between economic and social development to conservation,
the ICC expressed deep concern over the over-utilization
of underground water in Siem Reap. Such expression was due
to the future prospect that the excessive use of underground
water could alter the ecological system of the Siem Reap
region and could endanger the monuments in Angkor and Siem
Reap city. Alternative sources of water and the effective
utilization of water were proposed as solutions to avoid
such possibility. For insight and concrete background of
information on such concern, the Mekong River Commission
will be invited to participate in the next ICC meeting to
make a presentation on the relationships between the Tonle
Sap Lake and the Mekong River.
Furthermore, the ICC endorsed the APSARA Authority program
to diversify the attraction in the historic site of Angkor,
a prime tourist destination of Cambodia,. Not only has this
diversification helped provide meaningful and memorable
experience to tourist, but it helps to prolong their stay
in Cambodia. With this program, visitors will be able to
experience the richness of Angkor’s social and natural
beauties where the smiles of Khmer and the astonishing beauty
of flora and fauna are the main features. In this respect,
ICC has also recommended that the technical staff of the
Department of Tourism Development of Angkor be strengthened.
Concerning the proposed project of lighting of the Angkor
monuments, the ICC recommended that the program should keep
in mind the necessity to respect the visual integrity of
the site’s landscape as well as the international
standards of protection of World Heritage sites when the
implementation of this kind of project is proposed. Also
to avoid perturbations of the cultural and natural landscape
harmony of Angkor and the surrounding sub-soil of the monuments,
the ICC insisted that before implementing the project, a
proposal be submitted to the expertise of the Ad Hoc expert
group and to the Secretariat of the ICC, both of whom should
consequently inform the APSARA Authority of their opinion
on this matter..
|

Back to top |
 |
 |
|