International measures

While the social, economic and political changes begun in the late '80s brought new possibilities for sustainable development and security across the country, the situation simultaneously catalyzed great destruction and loss; cultural, natural and human resources have all suffered deeply. Faced with the open market, and before an unknown future, many in positions of power sought to consolidate personal wealth. In Siem Reap, the illegal art traffic, as well as logging, proved increasingly lucrative.

International conventions

It is however important to note that while threats to the Angkorian heritage increased dramatically during this transitional period, so did possibilities for protective action. In November of 1991 H.R.H. Prince Norodom Sihanouk signed the instruments of accession to the 1972 Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, thereby completing Cambodia's ratification of the three main existent international instruments for the protection of cultural property - the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, the 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Cultural Property, and the 1972 World Heritage Convention. Finally, the UNIDROIT Convention should be enacted very soon ; it constitutes a significative improval in the fight against illicit cultural goods trafic at the international level.

 

Submission of a request to the US government for restrictions on the importation of Khmer cultural heritage into the United States

After years of preparation, the Royal Khmer Government submitted, in April of 1999, a request to the Government of the United States of America to impose restrictions on the importation of Khmer cultural objects onto US territory.

The request is based on the following legal grounds:

  • Public international law: The "Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 16 November 1970", particularly its article 9 which reads: "Any State Party to this Convention whose cultural patrimony is in jeopardy from pillage of archaeological or ethnological materials may call upon other State Parties who are affected. The State Parties to this Convention undertake, in these circumstances, to participate in a concerted international effort to determine and to carry out the necessary concrete measures, including the control of exports and imports and international commerce in the specific materials concerned. Pending agreement each State concerned shall take provisional measures to the extent feasible to prevent irremediable injury to the cultural heritage of the requesting State"
  • US Public law: The "Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act", Public Law 97-446.

The request, which, if accepted, is to serve as the basis for US import restrictions and emergency measures for the protection of Cambodian cultural property, contains abundant evidence and commentary demonstrating that the current situation regarding Cambodian cultural property meets the requirements set out by US Public Law in order to obtain US measures pursuing the 1970 UNESCO Convention.

 

The Art Loss Register Database

The APSARA Authority and UNESCO plan to present on a database called Art Loss Register all the pieces that have been stolen from the Angkor Storehouses between 1972 and 1994. This database, specialized in the fight against illicit traffic of art pieces, is widely used by banks, insurance dealers and art sellers to check the legality of the pieces they wish to buy. The pieces presented in the book Looting in Angkor : one hundred missing objects (from ICOM) are already included in this database. Though the figures have not been definitively determined, it is estimated that some hundreds of objects disappeared from the Angkor Conservation during these past few decades.

 

Restitution of stolen cultural objects

Despite these diverse national and international efforts, sales of stolen Khmer cultural property are evidently and publicly taking place still, and involve the most renowned auction houses in Western capitals. Significant progress has however been made, on the international level, in slowing this illicit traffic:

  • A sandstone head (inventory DCA 1664) was sold by Sotheby’s (lot 143) in London in June 1985. It was subsequently found to be in the possession of the Honolulu Academy of Arts in the USA. Negotiations for its return began in February 1997.
  • In November 1988, Cambodia’s former Prime Minister Son Sann asked the British authorities to stop an auction sale at Sotheby’s in London where two Vishnu statues were to be sold. Both objects were still marked with inventory numbers. This action did not succeed in halting the sale, yet, highly publicized, it drew much-needed attention to the issues at hand.
  • Over the past decade many objects have been seized by Thai police, often working in collaboration with the Thai National Department of Fine Arts. Material is confiscated both during transport from the Cambodian border to Bangkok, or from Bangkok galleries themselves. Most of these seized pieces are now stored in the National Museum of Bangkok, pending definitive identification. One case has however been resolved: 13 objects confiscated from a Bangkok gallery in 1990 were officially returned to Cambodia at the end of 1996. This represents the largest return of Cambodian artifacts to date. A series of pieces from the temple of Banteay Chhmar, near the Thai border, were confiscated by Thai authorities in 1999. Now held in the Prachinburi provincial museum, they are to be returned to Cambodia in the near future.
  • On June 2, 1992 in a sale of Southeast Asian art held at Sotheby's in New York, ICOM found a torso of an eleventh-century feminine figure listed as stolen in Looting in Angkor (first edition p.46, DCA 7081) to have been sold to a Swiss gallery for US$63,250. The object was subsequently returned, alternately, to several of its previous owners. In August 1996 it was finally in the possession of a New York art gallery (Doris Wiener Gallery). In May of 1997, the gallery returned the statue to the Cambodian authorities.
  • An eleventh-century stone statue of a four-headed Brahma, sold by Sotheby's in London on 21 October 1993 for £2,070 was proven to be looted from Angkor. A photo of the head is included on page 92 of the first edition of Looting in Angkor (DCA 3489). The object was formally identified by ICOM and the EFEO. After several years of discussions between the Cambodian authorities, Sotheby’s and the possessor of the object, it was returned in Phnom Penh on December 4, 1996.
  • The Metropolitan Museum in New York had, as part of its South and Southeast Asian display, an early 10th-century head of the Brahmanic god Shiva which had been removed from a sculpture held in an Angkor Conservation storehouse. The object is referenced in Looting in Angkor (first edition, p. 80, DCA 5729). The Metropolitan informed ICOM they were in possession of the piece. After several years of correspondence between the Cambodian authorities and the Metropolitan, the latter returned the sculpture to Cambodia in March 1997.
  • On the same day, the Curator of the Metropolitan Museum’s South and Southeast Asian collection returned to Cambodia a second head which had also been reported as stolen in Looting in Angkor (first edition, p. 77, DCA 5602). Having been sensitized by the campaign to return stolen objects, the possessor, an American collector, had mandated the Metropolitan representative to return the head on his behalf.
  • In 1993, a piece which was in the hands of a Parisian art dealer was returned to the Cambodian Embassy in France. It should be noted that the dealer, sensitized by campaigns regarding the protection of the Khmer cultural heritage, voluntarily brought the stolen piece in his collection to the attention of the Khmer authorities.
  • In 1994 United States Customs in San Francisco, California, seized a sculpted stone head. After identification of the sculpture’s Khmer origin, and upon the request of the Royal Khmer government, it was returned, in July 1996, by the Ambassador of the United States directly to the King, who transferred it to the National Museum of Phnom Penh.
  • In October 1995, Dutch Customs seized four artifacts of Asian origin in the Rotterdam Harbor. Two of these objects were proven to be of Cambodian origin. After a request made by the Cambodian Consulate, the two objects were returned to Cambodia.
  • In a catalogue published by Sotheby’s London on 17 October 1996 and entitled «Islamic and Indian Art», two Khmer cultural objects were presented: a 12th-century Khmer sandstone relief of a feminine divinity (p.64 of the Catalogue) and a large 13th c. Khmer sandstone balustrade finial in the form of a naga (mythical serpent) (p.65 of the catalogue). These objects were presented as coming from Cambodia. The Cambodian authorities have requested Sotheby’s to return these objects.
  • Another piece was restituted by the National Museum of Sydney, Australia, in May 1997.
  • In 2000, several meters of a decorated wall of Banteay Chmar were seized at the Khmero-Thai border. An important part of this wall has unfortunately disappeared.

Back to top
 
   
 
© 2005 APSARA Authority This website was built in cooperation with the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation